Columns

For Her Campaign, Hillary Selects Contradictory Goals

Share
Tweet
email Email
Print
Advertisement
Hillary Clinton delivers remarks during the 2015 Toner Prize for Excellence in Political Reporting award in Washington

The Democratic frontrunner has reportedly selected the two themes she plans to emphasize in her presidential campaign but seems unconcerned that the twin goals contradict one another.

The March 23 headline in the New York Times proclaimed “Hillary Clinton Tests Two Themes for 2016: Working Together and Inequality.” Laura Meckler reports on a panel discussion at the left-leaning Center for American  Progress in which the former Secretary of State “road-tested the two themes likely to shape her pitch to the voters in the 2016 presidential campaign.”

One of those messages naturally emphasized the long-standing pitch of the Democratic Party, certain to be emphasized in any liberal political campaign: that “income inequality is a persistent problem” requiring sweeping and urgent aggressive federal action. “A lot of our cities are truly divided,” Mrs. Clinton lamented. “They have some of the most dynamic, well-educated, affluent people in the world, and people who are trapped in generational poverty.”

The second theme discerned by the New York Times would offer a more novel note to the Clinton campaign: an emphasis on ending Washington gridlock and working together across all partisan and ideological lines.

Of course, Barack Obama rose to prominence on the slogan that rather than “red states” and “blue states” we remained, truly, “the United States of America.” But as a candidate and more importantly as president he has hardly emphasized that goal or made successful efforts to overcome Washington’s polarization. Hillary Clinton apparently means to differentiate herself by stressing her ability to work even with those who passionately disagree with her. She told the Center for American Progress that we must “get out of the kind of very unproductive discussion that we’ve had for too long, where people are just in their ideological bunkers, have arguments instead of trying to reach across those divides and have some solutions.”

What she fails to acknowledge is that addressing her first goal – income inequality – requires efforts at redistribution and that governmental fights over who gets what, and who pays for it, make it harder, not easier, to work together. Typically, liberal politicians mean to level incomes by taking more from the privileged and using those resources for governmental programs that will somehow increase resources for the poor and middle class. In their worldview, society must always play a zero sum game: progress for one segment of the country means sacrifice for another. An effort to divert resources from those who earned them and to assign them to those who didn’t, hardly represents the right vehicle for ending bitter divisions in Congress or in our politics.

This leaves a major opening for conservative candidates for president to touch on the twin themes Hillary has apparently selected in a more credible and less contradictory way. Yes, there appears to be a national longing to reform the bickering and dysfunction that too frequently paralyze Washington, and there is also growing concern over the ability of the poor and the middle class to improve their status – “the right to rise,” as Jeb Bush describes it in his nascent campaign.

 

This column appeared at TruthRevolt.org on March 27, 2015.

Share
Tweet
email Email
Print

Comments (6)

Leave a comment
  1. David  •  Apr 3, 2015 at 5:20 pm

    Contradictions are a pillar of the left. Or maybe it could be better referred to as blissful ignorance. Possibly selective intelligence? Certainly transparency, clarity, integrity, honesty, are not on the democrat landscape. But then who cares?! Here’s a contradiction for you: Barack Obama, as far as presidents go the biggest loser in history, was the comfortable winner in two (2) presidential elections. Obviously the democrats have their finger on the pulse of the American electorate. I suppose the next question is; “is there a pulse?”. Sorry for the pessimism. I still agree with you that this is the greatest nation on God’s green earth. Hoping it stays that way!

    • Jay Bills  •  Apr 9, 2015 at 4:13 pm

      What campaign? He has not even declared her candidacy. Why not wait till she runs. And comment on Rand Paul’s flip flops please

      • @PacoNerdwest  •  Apr 10, 2015 at 7:28 pm

        Jay, “What campaign?” Those right wing wackos at the Center for American Progress and the NY Times apparently anticipate a ‘campaign’. Even so, wise of you do not to respond directly to the content of the article. Meanwhile, if you, like me, follow Mr. Medved, you might know he has concerns about previous positions Dr. Paul has taken in the past. Oh wait! Were you just trying to change the subject? Poseur! Bring the debate; your obfuscatory bumper sticker doesn’t cut it. Free Tibet!

  2. JGUY  •  Apr 3, 2015 at 9:46 pm

    David – President Obama biggest loser if you only listen to conservative talkers….most of
    whom are amazingly entertaining and thought provoking….like Michael Medved and Dennis
    Prager…. but they only represent one side of the American dialogue… Obviously, he
    is not the biggest loser or the personification of living evil as presented by some….
    he is just a man – elected by the People – doing what he considers to be the best he
    can do.

  3. Van  •  Apr 11, 2015 at 3:17 am

    I wonder how much things would change if the heads of the DNC and RNC made it a point to STOP vilifying the motives of one another in order to score political points. I would honestly love if a group of prominent politicians, Democrat and Republican, got together and took both sides to task for irresponsible statements.

  4. Tom Tusick  •  Apr 11, 2015 at 4:05 am

    Her staff proves to be with out a clue again.

Tell Us What You Think

All fields required. The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this website you agree to accept our Terms of Use.

Medhead - Michael Medved's Premium Content

Login Join
Advertise with us Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Michael

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get Medved weekly movie reviews, columns, and special offers delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe

The Michael Medved Show - Mobile App

Download from App Store Get it on Google play
Advertisement
Advertisement
Michael Medved's History Store Also available on TuneIn