Advertisement
Columns

Outlines of a Compromise?

Share
Tweet
email Email
Print
Advertisement

Even with the current hysteria over the looming sequestration, outlines of a sensible, bi-partisan compromise are painfully obvious. The Republicans want to trim deficits by cutting spending, while Democrats seek the same result through more sacrifices from the rich.

Why not give both sides what they demand—with government spending less and the rich sacrificing more—by cutting entitlement checks to rich people? It makes no sense to demand that rich people pay more in order to preserve entitlements that they don’t need. That policy may maintain the size of government, but does nothing to help families at any income level.

Instead of complaining that Warren Buffett pays taxes at lower rates than his secretary, we ought to object that his hard-working secretary pays payroll tax to cover ever-rising Social Security and Medicare checks for her billionaire boss.

Share
Tweet
email Email
Print

Comments (1)

Leave a comment
  1. Scott  •  Feb 28, 2013 at 8:05 am

    I agree. When did compromise become a dirty word?

Tell Us What You Think

All fields required. The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this website you agree to accept our Terms of Use.

Medhead - Michael Medved's Premium Content

Login Join
Advertise with us Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Michael

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get Medved weekly movie reviews, columns, and special offers delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe

The Michael Medved Show - Mobile App

Download from App Store Get it on Google play
Advertisement
Advertisement
Michael Medved's History Store Also available on TuneIn