The Tax-the-Rich Fairy Tale

email Email

The Obama administration and its allies are so eager to portray tax hikes on the rich as the solution to all our problems that they desperately desire to persuade the public that tax cuts for the rich caused all those problems in the first place.

Perhaps the most outrageous expression of this argument comes in a controversial new video from the California Federation of Teachers called “TAX THE RICH: AN ANIMATED FAIRY TALE.”

This eight-minute piece of puerile propaganda features the warm and winning voice of the 83-year-old Hollywood legend Ed Asner, who previously provided his vocal talents to a far more worthy example of the animator’s art: the fanciful, Oscar-winning Disney-Pixar masterpiece, UP.

This time, Asner concentrates on a distinctly downward trajectory, tracing America’s steep decline from the golden age before tax cuts for the rich to the suffering and despair of the present day. “Once upon a time,” he intones, “there was a land that was happy and prosperous. They had a great education system, safe streets, and jobs for everyone.”

Never mind that during the idyllic Jimmy Carter era of 70 percent top marginal tax rates, the “safe streets” mentioned in the video featured rates of violent crime nearly double the levels of today, or that the Carter unemployment rate of 7.6 percent (at the end of his term) nearly equaled our current level of joblessness and hardly provided “jobs for everyone.” Asner’s narration insists that high levels of taxation created a virtual utopia: “The people of this land paid for their good life by investing in their future together. They called this ‘paying taxes.’”

Then, the serpent of greed slithered into this American Eden: “But over time rich people decided they weren’t rich enough. So they came up with ways to get richer. The first way was through tax cuts.” The animation cleverly illustrates this reduction in rates by depicting giant scissors, slicing away (with heavily amplified sound effects) at benign images of parks and schools, like menacing instruments of national castration.

Asner’s suddenly mournful tones then describe the predictable results: “Schools, public safety, the roads, parks, libraries, public transportation all went into decline. The rich people didn’t care.” Worst of all, the sultans of selfishness accumulated such obscene levels of wealth that their piles of huge gold coins became “money towers” reaching into the clouds, which inevitably collapsed and crushed ordinary people under their overwhelming weight. At this point, the victims recognized that “it was the 1 percent who built the money towers that crashed on their houses and jobs” – affirming a dubious connection between the generation of wealth by some and the accompanying ruination of others.

Naturally, the preening plutocrats in the video – plump, top-hatted, cigar-chomping folk who resemble the Monopoly Man of the classic game – began to quake at the prospect of the aroused proletariat. “Now the rich people got worried. They thought that if the people get mad enough at us, they might take some of our money. This really upset the rich people, because they loved their money more than anything else in the whole world.”

At last, the long-suffering wretched of the earth reached blessed enlightenment as the timbre of Asner’s well-trained voice became brighter and sweeter: “People began to say, ‘Maybe the rich people have too much money now. And maybe our problems have something to do with the 1 percent not paying their fair share of taxes.”

The final image in the brief morality play featured the newly determined little guys rallying in front of signs demanding “Tax the Rich,” “Tax Corporations” and “Jobs Now!” while Asner posed a concluding question: “Can the people of this land do something to live happily ever after?” Accompanying material from the California Federation of Teachers urges concerned citizens to “do something” by getting involved in support of President Obama’s ongoing effort to raise tax rates on the rich.

The idea that national happiness depends on piling higher tax burdens on the wealthy counts as no more irrational than the notion that lower tax rate on top-earners somehow led to devastating declines in funding for schools, public safety, parks, transportation and other public needs.

In fact, total education spending per student has nearly doubled since Ronald Reagan became president and began wielding those menacing scissors and cutting tax rates. On the federal level, the U.S. Department of Education spent $14.2 billion (in constant dollars) when Reagan came to Washington but the budget rose to $56 billion in 2006 under President George W. Bush. From that point forward, with the reduced Bush tax rates firmly in place, spending soared again to $71 billion in 2011.

The perceived decline in transportation infrastructure, depicted with cracked and pot-holed streets in the Asner video, also bears less connection to overall funding cuts (which never occurred) than to the futile folly of diverting highway money to wildly impractical mass transit boondoggles. Since the era of Reagan and Bush tax cuts, government at every level has invested lavishly in ill-considered and outrageously expensive train systems (in Seattle, Portland, Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles and countless other cities) that have done nothing to relieve traffic or reduce commute times. Now the state of California and the federal government mean to collaborate on a laughably impractical high speed rail system that could cost $100 billion dollars, with a first-stage route connecting an under-populated corridor between Merced and Bakersfield, with a serious environmental impact on desert toads but no impact whatever on LA’s clogged freeways.

The bottom line in federal outlays also shows that tax cuts of the Reagan and Bush era did nothing to force a reduction in overall levels of spending. In 2000, the last full year of Bill Clinton’s purportedly perfect reign of peace and prosperity, the federal government spent 18.2 percent of the gross domestic product. Eight years later, after two rounds of major tax cuts and in the last full year of the George W. Bush presidency, Washington spent 20.8 percent of GDP – a substantial explosion of additional spending, not the imposition of some brutal austerity budget. After four years of Barack Obama’s leadership, with the Bush tax rates still firmly in place (for a few weeks more, at least), we now spend 24.3 percent, another perilous rise. While Grover Norquist, purveyor of the now notorious “no new taxes” pledge, popularized the phrase “starve the beast” as a demand for leaner, more effective government, it ought to be obvious that the beast in question now suffers from an acute obesity problem.

The most obnoxious element in the new animated fairy tale from the Golden State’s education establishment involves its irresponsible demonization of malevolent and immoral “rich people,” depicting them as a separate, subhuman species and not merely a privileged class. In one outrageous image, the rich perch on top of the scales of justice, raised high by huge bags of money, and urinate in a golden waterfall on the unsuspected poor who are huddled beneath them on the lower plate of the balance.

Of course Ed Asner himself, and the other millionaire Hollywood activists who clamor for higher tax rates, could unleash lavish donations to rain down their own showers of gold on supposedly starved parks and schools and firehouses. But they prefer to fund propaganda, demanding the seizure of even more money from their fellow plutocrats, to generous investment in direct public benefits. In the last election cycle, Democrats received and spent more than 3 billion in donations; imagine the acreage of wilderness and open space that might have been purchased with even a small portion of those contributions.

Identifying the rich with wanton cruelty and urinating-on-their-heads contempt might help foment the irrational urge to punish them as a way to lead America back to the land of “happily ever after.”  This animated animus could also justify the fear on the part of the wealthy that an enraged populace “might take some of our money”—as if sanctity of private property counted for nothing in the face of emotional indignation. Later, Asner’s narration noted that “people began to say maybe the rich have too much money now,” suggesting that the public had the right to determine the maximum levels of success that productive members of society ought to be allowed to achieve.

Of course, liberal reasoning never attempts to explain how limiting such success could serve the interests of the less fortunate. Nor will the left make any attempt to sketch a rational cause-and-effect relationship between hiking tax rates and improving public services, or to establish a connection between tax rate cuts and public suffering for anyone. Despite the lurid animation from the California teachers union and skillful narration by one of Hollywood’s liberal lions, those associations remain an irresponsible example of fairy tale logic.

An edited version of this column appeared originally in THE DAILY BEAST. 


email Email

Comments (7)

Leave a comment
  1. A Mike Pietri  •  Dec 11, 2012 at 11:21 pm

    Why can’t actors stick to acting? Leave the politics to the knuckleheads.

    • Jim C  •  Dec 14, 2012 at 5:15 pm

      As long as I can remember dumocrats have damned the evil rich, and had $50,000 per plate dinners for their candidates. And left-wing commie pinkos like Ed Asner are just the people they target.

      His little cartoon fails to mention that 67% of the taxes are paid by those evil rich devils.

  2.  •  Dec 14, 2012 at 11:25 am

    The truth that tax cuts were followed by higher revenues is easy to discover. Those who perpetuate the myth either don’t care about the truth or are too lazy to learn.

  3. Joseph la costa  •  Dec 14, 2012 at 11:42 am

    January is catholic schools month can you mention that during January

    Tale my wife’s school st Didacus in normal heights section of San Diego

    There are over 40 nationalities in the school and a huge cross section from drs and lawyers kids to new immigrants

    She educates at something like 6500 a year which is less than a third of real spending in San Diego public schools per pupil

    Yet the kids are in top 20 on national math program involving 8000 plus schools

  4. annie  •  Dec 14, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    It makes me literally sick, this propaganda being sold, not at the universities but now even at the elementary school level. The libs are so smart and seemingly in control of virtually everything. They don’t need to explain “why” their reasoning that suppressing success is crappy, they just need to appeal to emotion, and they are great at that and they control the media, AND they put their money where their mouth is when it comes to getting their message out in effective fashion.

  5. Iron Sights  •  Dec 16, 2012 at 5:34 pm

    The final solution for these left wing creeps, indoctrinating our children with this garbage, undermining our Constitution, our religious traditions, and in general, our way of life is….. unprintable, here.

  6. Todd  •  Dec 22, 2012 at 9:58 pm

    ok….what if congress gave 100% of what Obama wants to him. He gets to tax the top 2% at whatever rate he wants. Obamacare doesn’t change from its current state. And…Obama was allowed to spend all the money he wants on whatever he wants….he is King of America, ya know. What if….

    After 4 more years America would be destroyed. We would be worse than Greece. Welfare? Belly up. Food Stamps. Belly up. Medicare? Belly up. Medicade. Belly Up. Unemployment? 40%. Stock market? Worthless. U.S. dollar? Worthless.

    Can’t blame the Republicans because we gave the Democrats 100% of what they wanted, right? Does anyone think that the liberals might start to ponder the choice to live in a socialist state? Does anyone think the blame would be put squarely on Obama’s shoulders?

    Unfortunately, no. Republicans would still be blamed. The cult of personality, that is the liberal lie, is too strong. As others have stated, they own everything and the rank and file of the cult blindly follow. But what nobody has mentioned is the dumbing of America that is led by liberals. They don’t want to educate, they want to keep you stupid and relying on the government to provide for you. They don’t want you to succeed, they want you to fail…so they can control your life. Systematically they are dumbing down America. How do we fight that?

    Here are some facts that I try to explain to libs but it falls on deaf ears….

    If we tax the top 2% (households making over $250,000 a year) at 100%…yes, 100%. Every dime these people earn is sent to Obama. The total amount of money collected would fund the federal government for 91 days. 91 days. That’s it. Then what? Tax the top 5% of the income earners at 100%? Then the top 10%? 15%. 20%? Where does it end?

    They have help groups for people like Obama and his counterparts in Congress. One is called Shoppers Anonymous. A counselor sits with you and tries to help you stop spending money you don’t have. But here is the rub:

    When the patient doesn’t care how he looks in the eyes of others, instead only caring how he looks in his own eyes, no amount of counseling will help.

    Another fact:

    The average teacher salary in America is $44,000. Yet the Federal Department of Education average salary is $102,000. Why do we pay people who do not have educational experience more than the people teaching our children? I could have swore the constitution said education was to be controlled at the state level. Seems logical to me.

    I finish with this…

    Obama claimed unemployment went down…below 8%. All part of the cult of lies.

    Since June 160,000 jobs on average have been created. 80-90% of those were Government jobs which are not calculated into the unemployment rate. Only private sector jobs are counted. Obama also forgot to count the hundreds of thousands of unemployed people that have fallen off the Government radar. And of course he failed to factor in the underemployed. Reality is unemployment is probably around 13-14% and closer to 17-18% if you count underemployment.

    The Cult Of Lies is strong. The Cult of Lies will endure. Republicans need to stop worrying about winning elections and concentrate their efforts on reach people…1 person at a time.

    Thanks for reading…

    God Bless the former United States of America….

Tell Us What You Think

All fields required. The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this website you agree to accept our Terms of Use.


Listen Commercial FREE  |  On-Demand
Login Join
Advertise with us Advertisement

Follow Michael

The Michael Medved Show - Mobile App

Download from App Store Get it on Google play
Listen to the show on your amazon echo devices
Michael Medved's History Store Also available on TuneIn